Blog

Young Moore Blog

General Assembly Revises HB2 to Restore Discrimination Claims in State Court

We recently blogged on the little-discussed but impactful changes to North Carolina’s employment law contained in House Bill 2, also known as the “Bathroom Bill.” The law eliminated the right to bring employment discrimination claims in state court, and preempted local governments from changing the minimum wage.

Although these provisions did not spark the intense debate surrounding the bathroom restrictions, they are important in their own right, as evidenced by the General Assembly’s recent actions.

On Friday, the General Assembly revised the bill to restore the right to bring employment discrimination claims in state court. House Speaker Tim Moore told reporters that, “there was never an intent to limit the right of anybody to seek redress in state court.” However, the General Assembly simultaneously shortened the limitations period in which plaintiffs may bring such claims, from three years to one.

It is interesting that such a drastic change of course happened so quickly and so easily. Governor McCrory called for the restoration of state law discrimination claims months ago, and the Friday revisions passed overwhelmingly. Meanwhile, the General Assembly is standing firmly behind the bathroom provisions in HB2. It voted on Friday to move $500,000 from disaster relief to the HB2 court defense fund. As indicated by the comments of House Speaker Moore, the changes to the state’s employment law seem to have been an oversight.

The General Assembly has not yet revised the provisions in HB2 relating to the minimum wage. We will continue to monitor the situation closely.

About the author: Jonathan Crook practices on the firm’s litigation team. He focuses on employment law, insurance coverage analysis, and business litigation. Please contact him if you have questions or would like to discuss further

Electronic mail or other oral or written communication to Young Moore and Henderson P.A. in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you may not be treated as privileged or confidential. Communications are not privileged until the client and lawyer have agreed on legal representation. Please do not send confidential information to us via e-mail or in any other manner without first communicating directly with us about the attorney-client relationship. The transmission of an e-mail request for information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your initial email should only contain a list of the parties interested in the matter so that we can make sure we have no conflicts before you convey any information about your case.

Accept Decline