Craddock Helps Secure a Victory for North Carolina Employers

Angela Farag Craddock helped secure a victory for North Carolina employers through an amicus brief written on behalf of the N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys, the N.C. Association of Self-Insurers, and the N.C. Chamber in a case before the N.C. Supreme Court. A majority of the Court of Appeals ruled that a workers’ compensation claimant was not entitled to disability compensation where the Industrial Commission found his inability to find work was not due to his injury, but rather to large-scale economic factors. The dissenting opinion argued that a disabled worker should not bear the burden of unfavorable economic conditions that further diminish his ability to find suitable work, so the fact the plaintiff had made a reasonable effort to find other work should have been sufficient to support an award of ongoing disability compensation. In affirming the majority’s decision below, the Supreme Court made clear that proving a loss of wage earning capacity alone is not enough to merit workers’ compensation benefits, and that a claimant seeking disability compensation must also establish that his inability to find work was “because of ‘ his work-related injury. The Supreme Court further noted that since an injured worker’s ability to find new work is a function of both economic conditions and his physical limitations, consideration of economic factors is appropriately relevant to determining whether a claimant’s inability to find a job was because of his work injury. The case is Medlin v. Weaver Cooke Constr., LLC (N.C., 2014).

Electronic mail or other oral or written communication to Young Moore and Henderson P.A. in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you may not be treated as privileged or confidential. Communications are not privileged until the client and lawyer have agreed on legal representation. Please do not send confidential information to us via e-mail or in any other manner without first communicating directly with us about the attorney-client relationship. The transmission of an e-mail request for information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your initial email should only contain a list of the parties interested in the matter so that we can make sure we have no conflicts before you convey any information about your case.

Accept Decline